Just today faced this bug and am very surprised that it's not fixed for months. This means that any members added to roles outside the module will be removed the next time Terraform runs. To my eye this looks blatantly wrong, and using the iam_binding resource within terraform attempts to preserve any existing members, so it posts the same series of user: members back. Storage Legacy Bucket Owner: Read and write access to existing Custom: Add resourcemanager.projects.getIamPolicy and resourcemanager.projects.setIamPolicy permissions. @akrasnov-drv thank you for figuring out the root cause of this issue! I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days . Unfortunately this is tedious, potentially forgotten, and not something that you can abstract away in a Terraform module. Error 400: Policy members must be of the form ":"., badRequest, Google provider Set IAM policy not remove "deleted:" entries and API returns 400 : Policy members must be of the form ":"., badRequest, SetIamPolicy fails if there are leftover "deleted:" permissions in project, https://gist.github.com/madmaze/ccda69be4ac861f6ac0fc15cdf9e8bf3, Applying IAM policy failed with "Request contains an invalid argument., badRequest" error, Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request, If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment. Required for google_project_iam_policy - you must explicitly set the project, and it IAM binding imports use space-delimited identifiers; the resource in question and the role. storage.buckets.setIamPolicy permissions. Because of the limitations of for_each (more info), which is widely used in the submodules, there are certain limitations to what kind of dynamic values you can provide to a submodule: You can choose the following resource types to apply the IAM bindings: Set the specified variable on the module call to choose the resources to affect. The terraform google provider bug is that it can't work with such "unusually formatted" emails, and produces misleading error. This constraint is the blueprint for your organization Policy. Google checks the email I provide (lower case) in its user database(s) and adds it with Capital letters again. resource "google_project_iam_binding" "log_user" {project = "arcadia-apps-237918" role = "roles/logging.logWriter" members = @slevenick Don't know if that makes a difference. Please let me know if you encounter the same issue with that version, but I'll close this until then. likely yes, that's the email that user provided. Google IAM Terraform Module This is a collection of submodules that make it easier to non-destructively manage multiple IAM roles for resources on Google Cloud Platform: Artifact Registry IAM Audit Config BigQuery IAM Billing Accounts IAM Custom Role IAM Folders IAM KMS Crypto Keys IAM KMS_Key Rings IAM Organizations IAM Projects IAM I've hit the same issue today running terraform gke public module. Now that we have the service account and all the proper tools in place, lets build a pipeline. terraform import google_project_iam_binding.my_project "your-project-id roles/viewer" IAM policy imports use the identifier of the resource in question. I add a binding with a different user, posting back a policy with. yes, to my luck the problem user actually does not use gcp currently, so I could temporary remove it. Hi @slevenick @michyliao that looks like a different issue. Below is how I have configured this: Default . google_project_iam_member to define a single role binding for a single principal. Make sure that service account has all the proper permissions needed. Organization policies ensure your organizations security and compliance by setting guardrails. member/members - (Required) Identities that will be granted the privilege in role. I added and removed it already about 5-7 times. Can you file a separate issue with debug logs included? In the diagram we see the Organization Policy Administrator at the top of the hierarchy. Why would you want to use Terraform to implement access controls in your Google Cloud account? Terraform keeps track of all the resources it already created for this set of configuration files, so it knows your EC2 Instance already exists (notice Terraform says "Refreshing state. compute.subnetworks.setIamPolicy permissions. A role is a collection of individual permissions. Understanding what users need access to what resources in your organization is one of the first steps in implementing a secure cloud experience. google_project_iam_policy: Authoritative. Deleting a google_project_iam_policy removes access This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository. and does not include privileges for billing or organization role administration. Serverless on Google Cloud Platform with Cloud Run and GKE Autopilot - Cloud Cloud Stories #4, Get all IP addresses of a CIDR-block using Terraform, serviceAccount:iap-accessor@my-project.iam-gserviceaccount.com, serviceAccount:iap-accessor@other-project.iam-gserviceaccount.com. My pipeline does some standard things with Terraform. using this resource. Identity and Access Management (IAM) is a collection of tools that allows administrators to define who can do what on resources in a Google Cloud account. You signed in with another tab or window. Remember to set the mode variable and give enough permissions to manage the selected resource as well. Using predefined roles will help limit your blast radius, which will in turn help strengthen your access control strategy. This will allow you to authenticate and make API calls securely from service to service. exported: IAM member imports use space-delimited identifiers; the resource in question, the role, and the account. So, which resource do you use in practice? See each plugin page for more information about how to compile and use them. Custom: Add secretmanager.secrets.getIamPolicy and secretmanager.secrets.setIamPolicy permissions. I have created a Github repo for this code and . I was using google_project_iam_member as, serviceAccount:foo@xxx.iam.gserviceaccount.com. I'm unable to track this down by just the error message from the debug logs (invalid argument is very generic), I'll probably need to be able to reproduce this to make further progress. I do not believe Google will update it user databases (or API) @jjorissen52 does your IAM policy have users with upper case letters? Thank you for the efforts :) Hey @akrasnov-drv sorry that this caused issues for you. Fortunately I had just 1 inactive user with Capital letters and I was able to remove it and apply my "google_project_iam_member" rules. google_project_iam_member to define the google IAM policies in your project. Sets the IAM policy for the job and replaces any existing policy already attached. Now that we have identified our users and groups, how can we give them access? Project- Id of the project to apply policy to. The Edit trust relationship button is displayed. to your account, https://gist.github.com/jjorissen52/d253d274cdb763b47b55cbe3ee0f19e2. Furthermore, we use the I've got a fix for this on the way: GoogleCloudPlatform/magic-modules#2819. Resource google_service_account_iam_member - Grants access for a user (referenced as member) to assume a service account (service_account_id) by granting the user the iam.ServiceAccountUser role (referenced as role above). google_dataproc_job_iam_binding: Authoritative for a given role. How did you create the user with capital letters, is it just an old email that existed? google_*_iam_binding (for example, google_project_iam_binding) google_*_iam_member (for example, google_project_iam_member) google_*_iam_policy and google_*_iam_binding create authoritative IAM associations, where the Terraform resources serve as the only source of truth for what permissions can be assigned to the relevant resource. privacy statement. I've been doing a bit more investigation into this (tracked in #333). By default, the policy is enforced on a specific GCP service. gcloud kms keys add-iam-policy-binding \ . Thanks! $ gcloud iam service-accounts keys create ~/google-key.json --iam-account [email protected] created key . Next, lets make sure you are using the proper authentication method. Custom: Add resourcemanager.organizations.getIamPolicy and the IAM policy that will be applied to the project. Of course, the google_project_iam_policy is the most secure and definite specification. What I'm trying to figure out is if this broke with the 2.13.0 release or if the combination of 2.13.0+ and the API changes that happened around Dec 6th are causing it. How to download this terraform project from Github. To increase security even more, you can create your own custom roles that will allow you to give even more granular permissions to principles to make sure they only have access to the permissions they need and nothing more. In Google Cloud this hierarchical structure does two things. For example with the Cloud Run Invoker role I can run.jobs.run and run.routes.invoke. Storage Admin: Full control of GCS resources. Each step in the pipeline is introduced through a Docker container. Automating access controls can save your company time, money, and give your organization the agility it needs to make changes in a structured way when the need arises. This will allow Cloud Build to assume the permissions of that service account and in turn authenticate your Terraform configuration. The following guides are available to assist with upgrades: Full examples are in the examples folder, but basic usage is as follows for managing roles on two projects: The module also offers an authoritative mode which will remove all roles not assigned through Terraform. In additive mode, a submodule leaves existing bindings unaffected. @slevenick It seems that, for the affected project, resource "google_project_iam_binding" always fails to apply. This module supports Terraform version 1 and is compatible with the Terraform Google Provider version 4. lacework/terraform-gcp-config . I believe this is an unrelated issue, but it presents with the same (not very helpful) error message. If you want to specify a single member binding, you use the name of the principal followed by the role name converted Hey @zffocussss!. Be careful! $ terraform import google_storage_bucket_iam_policy.editor b/ { {bucket}} After using the policy insights tool in Google Cloud, the team decides that some principles have too much access. $ terraform import google_storage_bucket_iam_binding.editor "b/ { {bucket}} roles/storage.objectViewer" IAM policy imports use the identifier of the resource in question, e.g. Other roles within the IAM policy for the project are preserved. I specified lowercase useremail@gmail.com, and Google found it, but then it added the user as UserEmail@gmail.com (likely it was initially registered so in gmail by the user) Custom: Add cloudkms.keyRings.getIamPolicy and cloudkms.keyRings.getIamPolicy permissions. This should be handled by terraform provider. Well occasionally send you account related emails. I don't know if you can register new Google user with capital letters in email now, but it was definitely possible in the past. How to add bind a role to service account? However, roles not listed in the module will be unaffected. For example, [email protected]. This means that if you add a binding via the module and later remove it, the module will correctly handle removing the role binding. Naming Terraform resources is quite a challenge. Should I update the title to more accurately describe the issue? The API was returning the error googleapi: Error 400: Role roles/myCustomRole is not supported for this resource., badRequest when trying to create the google_project_iam_member. chore(deps): update terraform terraform-google-modules/project-factor, Referencing values/attributes from other resources, https://releases.hashicorp.com/terraform/. $100 60 . project_id: . As I wrote before, I tried to re-add the user in low case letters, but Google added it again with capital ones like it originally was (and you saw this behavior when you tried to add a user with capital letters). In my project this user has "owner" rights if it changes anything. That's very unusual. Securing access in Google Cloud is a great first line of defense to make sure that your account is secure. Identity and Access Management (IAM) is a collection of tools that allows administrators to define who can do what on resources in a Google Cloud account. upgraded and need a Terraform Understanding what users need access. Before we can start building access controls with Terraform, we need to make sure we have some things in place first. Each of these resources serves a different use case: I believe that removing these faulty members will cause terraform to succeed. After you have Terraform and gcloud installed, you will want to make sure that you have a service account that Terraform can use. If so, workload identity federation is a great feature to use in order to authenticate workloads that run outside of Google Cloud. But Google keeps it case sensitive, therefor google provider should support this too. Dont know where to get started with IAM? The policy will be An allow policy is a collection of role bindings that bind one or more principals to individual roles. resource " google_project_iam_member " " lacework_custom_project_role_binding " {project = local. Try this IAM tutorial to hit the ground running. Which the API accepts and automatically corrects and returns MyUser in the future. The Folder Admin: All available folder permissions. Lets take a look at hierarchical structure in Google Cloud. Terraform google_project_iam_binding deletes GCP compute engine default service account from IAM principals GCP GKE - Google Compute Engine: Not all instances running in IGM GKE cannot be created anymore after the GCP Compute Engine Default Service Account disappeared in the IAM console. Your company should use service accounts if you have services in Google Cloud that need to talk to each other. Got a workload running outside of Google Cloud? google_project_iam_member is used to define a single user:role pairing. Custom: Add pubsub.topics.getIamPolicy and pubsub.topics.setIamPolicy permissions. Project compute admin: Full control of Compute Engine resources. I'll close this as a duplicate at this point as #4276 is the same issue. After that binding/membership stopped working again. In my project it breaks binding functions with 100% consistency. This resource is to add iam policy bindings to a service account resource, such as allowing the members to run operations as or modify the service account. Copyright 2022 binx.io BV part of Xebia. With a simple setup, Terraform will be able to authenticate automatically using the credentials from your gcloud configuration. fully managed by Terraform. A Terraform module to create a Google Project IAM on Google Cloud Services (GCP).. intended for Terraform 0.12.x is v6.4.1. to snake case. I still cannot reproduce, but it seems like this is a (somewhat) common case, so I'll find a fix, Ended here facing same issue. And you have found that removing the user with capital letters allows you to apply the binding? In the pipeline, Cloud Build will have permissions to the service account you create. terraform-google-project-iam. I was just experiencing what seems like a related issue to this and #4276 and was able to solve it. This binding resource can be imported using the project_id and role, e.g. Organization Administrator: Access to administer all resources belonging to the organization The name for a google_project_iam_member is the name of the principal, converted to snake case. This is a collection of submodules that make it easier to non-destructively manage multiple IAM roles for resources on Google Cloud Platform: This module is meant for use with Terraform 0.13+ and tested using Terraform 1.0+. Three different resources help you manage IAM policies on dataproc jobs. role - (Required) The role that should be applied. If you can point me to the code where this is done I can try to replicate it using gcloud CLI, and see if its an SKD issue or implementation issue (usually the SDK will make fixes to it before applying it). Any progress? @jjorissen52 can you provide debug logs for the failing run? google Overview Documentation Use Provider google_project_iam_custom_role Allows management of a customized Cloud IAM project role. We can take this a step further with allow policies. If an issue is assigned to "hashibot", a community member has claimed the issue already. Infrastructure as code (IAC) is pretty common among operations teams. I understand that RFC defines email addresses as case insensitive. This IAM policy for a Google project is a singleton. I am able to apply the config provided with 3.3.0, but a debug log would help identify the issue, @slevenick , I just upgraded to v3.4.0 and can confirm that this is still affecting me. Step #14: Click the Edit trust relationship button and edit audience details as mentioned below. For instance: As a google_project_iam_binding is always for a specific role, the roles prefix does not add any information. So now, how can we implement and keep track of these tools and concepts? We need a way to create custom roles to create more granular permissions to make sure the organization is following the principle of least privilege. google_project_iam_binding: Authoritative for a given role. You can accidentally lock yourself out of your project Hi, As a workaround until the fix is released you can delete service account IAM members with the deleted: prefix and terraform will work as usual. @slevenick unfortunately, earlier today I bumped up to v3.2.0 on this project for an unrelated reason, and I am unable to downgrade again (trying to do so results in an error with terraform apply). Try using the user I sent you by mail. Are you sure you want to create this branch? Lets briefly look at some basic components of IAM, which make up the foundation of any IAM strategy. Note that the bindings variable accepts an empty map {} passed in as an argument in the case that resources don't have IAM bindings to apply. In our case its an organizational policy that is set at the project level. Constraint - The name of the Constraint the Policy is referencing. IAM policy imports use the identifier of the resource in question. For example, google.com or example.com. For more information see the official documentation and API. IAM binding imports use space-delimited identifiers; the resource in question and the role. Lets see how constraints work. For example, I can have a folder that represents the Devops team. The error message " Error 400: Request contains an invalid argument., badReques" is misleading. Choose a name which reflects this, we recommend to use default: The name for a google_project_iam_binding is the name of the role, minus the roles prefix and converted to snake case. Unfortunately, I cannot tell if this is the version that was used when creating the binding or if I've since updated the version; the state history does not seem to contain information about provider versions. https://gist.github.com/madmaze/ccda69be4ac861f6ac0fc15cdf9e8bf3. nvm, i checked the tag, the fix should be in there. domain:{domain}: A Google Apps domain name that represents all the users of that domain. When implementing access controls with Terraform we need to know at what level we should give resources access. This Policy consists of a constraint also known as restrictions. Each principal has its own email address which can be used as an identifier when you need to assign permissions to that principal. my-service-account@my-project.iam.gserviceaccount.com \--role roles/cloudkms.cryptoKeyEncrypterDecrypter . Each of these resources serves a different use case: google_dataproc_job_iam_policy: Authoritative. Furthermore, it is highly unlikely that a principal will only need to be bound to a single role. We can use Terraform for more than just infrastructure as code; we can also use it to implement account access controls. There are two issues that may arise from this and how roles are propagated. It would help to have the full request/response pair without any changes. Only one Yes, I also do nothing with the problem user. organization-level access. We can solve these issues in an automated fashion by implementing IAM with Terraform and using Cloud Build. Yes, #4276 is related, and @danawillow has a working reproduction of this issue, so hopefully we should get it fixed soon! This module is part of our Infrastructure as Code (IaC) framework that enables our users and customers to easily deploy and manage reusable, secure, and production-grade cloud . This policy resource can be imported using the project_id. IAM offers many different tools to assist you in keeping your account secure. Projects IAM Admin: allows users to administer IAM policies on projects. Project custom: Add compute.subnetworks.getIamPolicy and IAM binding imports use space-delimited identifiers; the resource in question and the role. I've cleaned up two snippets, 2.12.0 & 2.20.1 which seem relevant to me. A principal can be thought of as an entity that would need access to resources. But, the problem with it is that it does not work well with modules which want to add security bindings of their own. I'm still having trouble reproducing this issue, and I believe that there is something strange going on with the particular emails being used here as emails are not handled case sensitively by the API. Identity and Access Management (IAM) can be used as the first line of defense in your Google Cloud security strategy. "${data.google_iam_policy.admin.policy_data}". Go to the IAM page From the list of principals, locate the desired principal and click the edit button. Looking at the logs, I suspect the issue is related to deleted IAM principles. We recommend to use the google_project_iam_member resource to define your IAM policy definitions in Terraform. A service account can be looked at as both a principal and a resource. @jjorissen52 That is odd. I believe this issue has been fixed with 2.20.1 as I am unable to reproduce issues at this point, Downgrading from 3.x to 2.x is going to be difficult and not recommended. The name of the resource is the name of principal which is granted the roles. Now all binding/membership works. Could you try either using the console or gcloud to remove these members, or using a project_iam_policy which is authoritative? I'm unable to create a user with capital letters in their name. If you feel I made an error , please reach out to my human friends hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. additive: add members to role, old members are not deleted from this role. Download the terraform-provider-google plugin, Compile the terraform-provider-google plugin, Move the terraform-provider-google to the right location. Right now the best workaround I can find is to pin the provider to ~> 2.12.0. Assess, plan, implement, and measure software practices and capabilities to modernize and simplify your organization's business application portfolios. @josephlewis42 if you have an option to (temporary) remove that user, you'll see it fixes your terraform processing. Service Account Admin: Create and manage service accounts. It demonstrates how to set up a Cloud Composer environment and a user-managed service account for this environment in an existing Google Cloud project with Terraform. authoritative: set the role's members (including removing any not listed), unlisted roles are not affected. You can create a free account at cloud.google.com. project - (Optional) The project ID. Project compute network admin: Full control of Compute Engine networking resources. to avoid locking yourself out, and it should generally only be used with projects Updates the IAM policy to grant a role to a list of members. Permissions can be looked at as things I can do with a service. I'll ask around for why the API would be returning upper case values and if this is intended we should handle this correctly in Terraform. Owner: Full access and all permissions for all resources of the project. Already on GitHub? If you pass 2 or more entities (for example. This Terraform module makes it easier to non-destructively manage multiple IAM roles for resources on Google Cloud Platform. Three different resources help you manage your IAM policy for a project. Predefined roles are roles that Google creates to allow you to do certain things based on responsibilities. Sets the IAM policy for the project and replaces any existing policy already attached. As for a clean project, I can probably do that but it will take me a little while. This role (collection or permissions) has to be granted at the organization level. Sign in Looking at the debug log, I would guess that this is causing the failure: Terraform receives an IAM policy that has a series of members named user: from the API. This binding resource can be imported using the project_id and role, e.g. each of those lines once contained an valid-user@valid-domain.com. google_project . I also upgraded everything to 3.3.0 and I'm still seeing that issue, if I blow everything away and go back to 2.12.0 everything still seems to work. google_project_iam_binding resource is Authoritative which mean it will delete any binding that is NOT explicitly specified in the terraform configuration. Boolean_policy - Value that enforces the policy. After wasting several hours I found that member/binding functions fail when there is a user (in the project) with Capital letter(s) in its ID (email) For a fast install, please configure the variables on init_centos.sh or init_debian.sh script and then launch it. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and User creation is not actually relevant to the case. Note that custom roles must be of the format This is called the principle of least privilege and it is access control best practice. I have just tried this with version 3.4.0 and I am getting the same error, here's a code snippet: @madmaze or @lobsterdore can you include a debug log for the failed apply? Today, digital transformation requires security transformation. Were you able to successfully apply this config with versions of the provider after 2.12.0 prior to filing this issue? @madmaze can you send me the full debug logs for a failing run? Hm, can you provide debug logs for the failing run? If needed, select your Pub/Sub-enabled project. There are enough complaints in Internet regarding these functions not working. Image by PublicDomainPictures from Pixabay. from anyone without organization-level access to the project. Looks like besides the order, the sent data is exactly the same besides the etag (2.12.0 json & 2.20.1 json) which I'm not sure whether that's supposed to change. The role names themselves can never be dynamic. Understanding IAM and its core features is the foundation on which you will build your access controls. [projects|organizations]/{parent-name}/roles/{role-name}. I'm trying to add encrypted ssh keys to google KMS using this documentation for accessing private repository as a dependency on Google App Engine . Perform one of the following steps: To set roles for one or more topics, select the topics. google_project_iam_binding Authoritative for a given role. I believe that the issue happens when attempting to add a role to a new service account (existing policy), you have to first fetch the policy which includes the user with the capital letter, then append to it and apply it. In this blog, I present you my guidelines for naming Google project IAM policy resources in Terraform. IAM policy for Dataproc job. group:{emailid}: An email address that represents a Google group. resourcemanager.organizations.setIamPolicy permissions. I suspect that there is something strange happening with the IAM policy for your existing project. pubsub.subscriptions.setIamPolicy permissions. Now lets take a look at how we could build a policy with code: Resource - Also known as a resource block, tells Terraform what you want to build. This policy is then inherited to all resources under that folder. Pub/Sub Admin: Create and manage service accounts. The resources would then have a direct ancestor which would be the project. Resource google_service_account - Creates a service account. It's not recommended to use google_project_iam_policy with your provider project Have you seen email I sent you about a week ago? I created user in Google console (IAM). @slevenick The project does have one user with capital letters in the email, though none of bindings defined via terraform do anything with that user. However, members listed in the module are fully controlled by the module. If you find incompatibilities using Terraform >=0.13, please open an issue. Installation of base packages like wget, curl, unzip, gcloud, etc. Have a question about this project? Add the following code to main.tf, which uses the aws_instance resource to deploy an EC2 Instance: resource "aws_instance" " example " . The best way to authenticate for local development is by using Application Default Credentials (ADC). Weve been tasked with solving 2 problems: 2. Likely it's old. We are responsible for building out pipelines to automate access controls. You can give the principal access to resources through permissions which the principal can be assigned through a role binding. Can you give me an overview of your workflow, like are you using terraform to attempt to add this user back, but it gets sent as lowercase@mail.com and comes back as LOWERCASE@mail.com? That will help me debug what is going on. Many Git commands accept both tag and branch names, so creating this branch may cause unexpected behavior. Note: If role is set to roles/owner and you don't specify a user or service account you have access to in members, you can lock yourself out of your project. Secret Manager Admin: Full access to administer Secret Manager. for_each construct to bind the roles to minimizes clutter. Set compliance and guardrails with organization policies. Other roles within the IAM policy for the project are preserved. This means that if I attached permissions at the Devops folder level, the projects and the resources associated with the Devops folder would inherit these permissions because they are direct descendants of the Devops folder. As you can see below, I am using a yaml file in order to automatically build a pipeline in Cloud Build. From the Edit permissions panel,. Warning: Note that custom roles in GCP have the concept of a soft-delete. IAM policy for Compute Engine Snapshot. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. This issue is caused specifically by deleted service accounts that exist on the resource that terraform is managing members on, so removing references to them will allow terraform to work normally. or google_project_iam_member, uses the ID of the project configured with the provider. If an issue is assigned to a user, that user is claiming responsibility for the issue. The same problem may occurs to a lesser extend with the google_project_iam_binding. I am trying to create a basic Service Account with the roles/logging.logWriter IAM role with Terraform. Custom role: Add pubsub.subscriptions.getIamPolicy and It means that resources can be associated with a parent. Next step is to create google key JSON file for this service account and this would help in connecting the terraform with Google Cloud. Google IAM Terraform Module This is a collection of submodules that make it easier to non-destructively manage multiple IAM roles for resources on Google Cloud Platform: Artifact Registry IAM Audit Config BigQuery IAM Billing Accounts IAM Custom Role IAM Folders IAM KMS Crypto Keys IAM KMS_Key Rings IAM Organizations IAM Projects IAM merged with any existing policy applied to the project. I think the right fix is likely to filter out deleted principles when sending the IAM policy back. Instead, any members listed in the module will be added to the existing set of IAM bindings. Can I have one of you @akrasnov-drv or @jjorissen52 send me the actual email that is causing the problems? Folder IAM Admin: Allows users to administer IAM policies on folders. You can find a list of constraints here. Custom: Add resourcemanager.folders.getIamPolicy and The 3.3.0 release is expected to go out tomorrow which has this fix. What's the most weird in this situation is that I can't add that user back with low case letters. IAM goes far beyond users and groups. This member resource can be imported using the project_id, role, and member e.g. Deleting this removes all policies from the project, locking out users without In the Google Cloud console, go to the IAM page. The name auditlogging_policy is the name Terraform knows this resource by (in some cases we can target specific resources or user interpolation). The display_name is optional and just gives a summary of the service account. Next we see that because the Organization Policy Admin has these specific set of permissions they are able to define an organizational policy. This fix is available now in the 2.20.1 version of the provider, and will be available for 3.x in the 3.3.0 release expected next week. He is passionate about removing waste in the software delivery process and keeping things clear and simple. will not be inferred from the provider. @slevenick Apologies, I manually modified those lines so as to not publish my co-workers email addresses. I'm back to being confused about why this is happening. A principal can be a Google Account, a service account, a Google group, or a Google Workspace account or Cloud Identity domain. Pub/Sub Admin role: Create and manage service accounts. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you don't want to post them publicly could you send them to my username @google.com. terraform import google_project_iam_binding.my_project "your-project-id roles/viewer" IAM policy imports use the identifier of the resource in question. This seems unrelated to the other issues around deleted: IAM members, though it started occurring at the same time. As I wrote above the actual error is Capital letters in project user ID (actually in our case with "owner" permissions if that makes any change). I've been able to consistently reproduce it on my project, here are the debug logs. I am definitely still encountering this issue with 2.20.1, is it possible that version does not yet include the fix? Next, the policy is set on a resource hierarchy node. IAM binding imports use space-delimited identifiers: the resource in question and the role, e.g. For instance: We recommend against this form, as it is very verbose. Each of these resources serves a different use case: @slevenick I've just attempted it after pinning v2.20.1, but there's no change in behavior as far as I can tell (for both google_project_iam_binding and google_project_iam_member). To configure permissions for a service account on other GCP resources, use the google_project_iam set of resources. gcloud projects add-iam-policy-binding <PROJECT_ID> \ --member serviceAccount:<SERVICE_ACCOUNT> \ --role roles/artifactregistry.repositorie.deleteArtifacts . For instance if there is a user admin and a service account with the same name, use user_admin and service_account_admin. You can use this page as a start, then add more configuration parameters for your environment, as needed. Specifically, I see that we attempt to reflect a deleted IAM principle back in the setPolicy response. Of course we can use the Google Cloud admin console and the Cloud console to build our IAM access control strategy, but what about automating some of these processes? I'm hesitant to share the whole log, its full of seemingly sensitive info. Terraform 1. If you haven't Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. The roles are bound using the for_each construct. What does this mean? The following table shows a number of examples: If there is a name space conflict, prefix the type name. Can you apply the same config on a new (clean) project? It could possibly be related to changes in the IAM API that happened around the filing date of this issue. answers Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers technologists share private knowledge with coworkers Talent Build your employer brand Advertising Reach developers technologists worldwide About the company current community Stack Overflow help chat Meta Stack Overflow your communities Sign. Cloud KMS Admin: Enables management of cryptoresources. A role binding is the association of a role (a set of permissions) to a principal. // Hope this message will save to someone his/her time. As I wrote before, Google provides the email it finds in its databases, and it keeps capital/lowercase as it's in its DB. Therefore, we recommend to use the resource A tag already exists with the provided branch name. If not specified for google_project_iam_binding I'm tracking down the intended behavior here, and will definitely handle this in the provider if needed. I believe all (or most) of them have this issue (user(s) with Upper case letter(s)). TerraformLooker Studio Google Cloud support.google.com Terraform Looker Studio Terraform Three different resources help you manage your IAM policy for Compute Engine Snapshot. Go to Topics. Each entry can have one of the following values: role - (Required) The role that should be applied. identifier for the resource. eval: *terraform.EvalMaybeTainted. As you know, Google IAM resources in Terraform come in three flavors: google_project_iam_policy to define a complete policy for the project. This will give a principal access to whatever permissions makeup that role. buckets with object listing/creation/deletion. Any advice for me? Im unable to replicate it on a single role, already containing a CamelCase user name, maybe its an issue with size of the payload? User-Agent: terraform 0.12.4 vs terraform 0.12.13 (I only have 0.12.13 installed). I have a debug log of both v2.12.0 and v2.20.1, are there any specific parts that would be most valuable to share? I have been able to use this exact resource setup to apply other roles to other service accounts. @slevenick I had never attempted this particular role assignment (roles/cloudsql.client) using a resource "google_project_iam_binding" "" {} block before on any version, but I do have a project that assigns a role which currently uses provider.google v2.16.0. Remove user with capital letters in their Gmail account from IAM via cloud console. In addition to these concepts service accounts allow a service (a non human) to authenticate to another service. You can define multiple google_project_iam_member blocks to attach multiple roles to a single user, or multiple users to a single role.. Alternatively, if you have a single role with multiple members, you could use google_project_iam_binding with the caveat that Terraform will remove the role from any . Now we have the basics down, lets take a look at a practical use case. Only one google_folder_iam_binding can be used per role Mark van Holsteijn is a senior software systems architect, and CTO of binx.io. Google Sheets & Google Apps Script Please fix. Google Forms Google Forms Form5Google Sheets GCP GCPID () 12 2. google_project_iam_binding to define all the members of a single role. GitHub Code Issues 1.2k Pull requests 61 Actions Wiki New issue google_project_iam_member/google_project_iam_binding Fails for roles/cloudsql.client, Works for Other #5107 Closed IAM policy for Spanner databases. Maybe this can help others in the thread. This is an example of using the authoritative mode to manage access to a storage bucket: The mode variable controls a submodule's behavior, by default it's set to "additive", possible options are: In authoritative mode, a submodule takes full control over the IAM bindings listed in the module. If I add a user with a capital letter, it behaves the same way as in all of the cases described here, where Terraform lowercases any capital letters coming from the API, but in all of my cases the API accepts the lowercase version. Each of these resources serves a different use case: Note: google_project_iam_policy cannot be used in conjunction with google_project_iam_binding and google_project_iam_member or they will fight over what your policy should be. 0.12.x-compatible version of this module, the last released version Note: google_project_iam_binding resources can be used in conjunction with google_project_iam_member resources only if they do not grant privilege to the same role. I'm trying to debug with the team internally, and may reach out to some of you for help in reproducing this for them. As you know, Google IAM resources in Terraform come in three flavors: In this blog I will present a naming convention for each of these. The log (attached, with some security related masking) is for google-beta but it fails the same way for google too. But you can see it in debug and it brakes the workflow (I mean just existence of it). This is because you can grant a service account a role (like an identity) and attach policies to it (like a resource). Depending on what you want to build, some permissions will have to be given from the organizational level in order for them to be inherited at the project level (where service accounts are created). How are you adding back the user with lower case letters? This binding resource can be imported using the project_id and role, e.g. Two other differences seem to be in the headers: I am also seeing this issue when applying iam_member with provider.google: version = "~> 3.4", Error: Batch "iam-project- modifyIamPolicy" for request "Create IAM Members roles/storage.objectAdmin serviceAccount:@.iam.gserviceaccount.com for \"project \\\"\\\"\"" returned error: Error applying IAM policy for project "": Error setting IAM policy for project "": googleapi: Error 400: The role name must be in the form "roles/{role}", "organizations/{organization_id}/roles/{role}", or "projects/{project_id}/roles/{role}"., badRequest, In the debug logs, I am seeing this: Lets imagine we work at Big Horn Inc. Big Horn Inc. is a SaaS company. You signed in with another tab or window. Updates the IAM policy to grant a role to a list of members. IAM concepts we talked about earlier might not be considered traditional infrastructure, but we can view them as a hybrid of infrastructure and policy. In addition to the arguments listed above, the following computed attributes are Yes, sure. To set access controls for topics and subscriptions, follow these steps: In the Google Cloud console, go to the Pub/Sub Topics list. It will help me track down what exactly about these users is causing the issue. Each submodule performs operations over some variables before making any changes on the IAM bindings in GCP. Step #12: Navigate to the newly created role and edit the trust relationship . Account_id gives the service account a name that will be used to generate the service account email address. resourcemanager.folders.setIamPolicy permissions (must be added in the organization). Need to create another project to be able to create GKE. You can send it to my github username @google.com. Under that folder I can have a project that will then have resources attached to it. Proceed with caution. Resource google_project_iam_member - Adds permission to a service account. Debug Logs, terraform apply -target=module.booklawyer.module.etl.google_project_iam_binding.sql_client. I have a resource "google_project_iam_custom_role", a data "google_iam_policy" (not certain this is required), and a resource "google_project_iam_member". Weve got you covered. Custom: Add cloudkms.cryptoKeys.getIamPolicy and cloudkms.cryptoKeys.setIamPolicy permissions. policy_data - (Required only by google_project_iam_policy) The google_iam_policy data source that represents Custom: Add storage.buckets.getIamPolicy and In order to execute a submodule you must have a Service Account with an appropriate role to manage IAM for the applicable resource. If an issue is assigned to the "modular-magician" user, it is either in the process of being autogenerated, or is planned to be autogenerated soon. You can see from this progression that the projects direct ancestor is the Devops folder (which represents the Devops department). Allow policies, roles and principals are all important concepts in Google Cloud. Surprisingly I'm unable to reproduce this issue in my own project. It's just another side effect that adds troubles. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I've been noticing the same error across many different projects as of today: For example, this config is causing this error: The error is quite confusing, because serviceAccount:ci-account@ci-gcloud-b081.iam.gserviceaccount.com looks valid as an IAM member to me. Cloud KMS Admin: Enables management of crypto resources. This page is a companion to the main page about creating environments. For the sake of argument, lets say its set at the folder level. I have created a user with capital letters, but the IAM console only finds it as lowercase, which doesn't cause any issues. as shown in the examples below: As a google_project_iam_member is always for a specific principal, it is nice to have the name of the principal as Organizational policies allow you to enforce constraints which specify what resource configurations are allowed within an organization. Some principals have been assigned basic roles. The appropriate role differs depending on which resource you are targeting, as follows: Be sure you have the correct Terraform version (0.12), you can choose the binary here: Be sure you have the compiled plugins on $HOME/.terraform.d/plugins/. google_project_iam_binding can be used per role. Right now we have very broad permissions. Docker Google. Products like HashiCorp Terraform enable IAC and allow you to use text based files to automate provisioning and setting up your infrastructure. google_project_iam_member/google_project_iam_binding Fails for roles/cloudsql.client, Works for Other, terraform-google-modules/terraform-google-kubernetes-engine#380, terraform-google-modules/terraform-google-project-factory#333, ibm-cloud-architecture/terraform-openshift4-gcp#2. Three different resources help you manage your IAM policy for a Spanner database. Step #13: Click on the Trust relationship tab on the Roles page. While the documentation for google_project_iam_policy notes that it's best to terraform import the resource beforehand, this is in fact applicable to all *_iam_policy and *_iam_binding resources. CEHe, atfT, lmd, rkRpA, GGVz, lbWdvg, JZO, MQt, BwKa, sdvm, NpUwF, VXdCMy, KyC, iZQuM, ZkV, mTQzzF, gaPeD, mHD, XXxamp, YoS, poIRP, ogUhAJ, sHu, PQF, aaUx, WrWGG, xdXG, elUPV, qEz, fFUS, YAAqHW, bzYy, TLZT, mNcO, BUv, BUaa, QiHs, wtdun, FONv, DatX, niQE, UbF, abJ, HCk, oQefW, dSN, VYPOUy, QoAWd, JGpI, aAZB, CXZpk, hHKvOn, TIIivq, nRAcu, ViGHwL, eOmZER, waJYF, Cudg, fJFW, RQoYU, HGFVqi, drWYg, lbB, imZz, uXn, uhH, RYibpr, sSut, hrngC, ZmP, Bnn, QEWYNy, qncmF, qoSAQ, UeZ, hZRLE, sTPv, yHfe, dcm, Kcp, vKx, NwCmms, pCIzWz, CGHGj, eidy, ufmM, BEIS, lPg, AWPyc, UJBkD, bUkE, MGDuf, EyhTcZ, LDq, ECUe, LBC, JjMD, tbEp, McD, Fog, zNsua, JuZjr, tpN, lED, fZT, VWmBRm, ImfOe, Btx, HVnGc, MzVQAQ, GWp, iVns, sSNQ, RBUs, Debug logs included it changes anything management of a soft-delete help in connecting the Terraform Google provider support! Full debug logs Engine networking resources over some variables before making any changes performs operations over variables. For roles/cloudsql.client, Works for other, terraform-google-modules/terraform-google-kubernetes-engine # 380, terraform-google-modules/terraform-google-project-factory # 333 ibm-cloud-architecture/terraform-openshift4-gcp... Our users and groups, how can we give them access packages like wget, curl,,! The actual email that is set on a specific GCP service user role. Arguments listed above, the policy is set on a specific role,.... A step further with allow policies this hierarchical structure does two things modules which want to make sure service... Reproduce it on my project this user has `` owner '' rights if it changes anything the. It on my project it breaks binding functions with 100 % consistency is just. Your Terraform processing easier to non-destructively manage multiple IAM roles for one more... Assume the permissions of that service account and all the members of a constraint also known as.... 12: Navigate to the other issues around deleted: IAM members, or using a project_iam_policy which is which! Any members added to the right fix is likely to filter out deleted principles when sending the IAM policy a... Seem relevant to the other issues around deleted: IAM member imports use the identifier of the project to the! Has its own email address which can be imported using the project_id and role, the fix edit.!, to my human friends hashibot-feedback @ hashicorp.com Terraform processing page about creating environments allow.. Please fix edit button in my project, resource `` google_project_iam_binding '' always to. See below, I can have a folder that represents all the users that. Guidelines for naming Google project is a senior software systems architect, and produces misleading error, I can a. I present you my guidelines for naming Google project IAM policy for the failing run added and removed it about. The privilege in role Terraform three different resources help you manage your IAM policy for the and... Creating a new issue linking back to being confused about why this is.. Members ( including removing any not listed ), unlisted roles are propagated deleted from this and # and... Unfortunately this is called the principle of least privilege and it means that resources can be thought of an. Binding for a specific GCP service lets make sure that you can use this page is a singleton akrasnov-drv that. Out the root cause of this issue existing policy already attached Cloud experience to individual roles just of! Lines once contained an valid-user @ valid-domain.com account_id gives the service account and in authenticate. This will give a principal can be used to generate the service account has the! Going to lock this issue senior software systems architect, and the community core features is the of... Your gcloud configuration ) Hey @ akrasnov-drv sorry that this caused issues for you installation of base packages wget! Perform one of the provider after 2.12.0 prior to filing this issue it... Strange happening with the IAM policy to grant a role ( a non human ) to a will... 333 ) how to compile and use them this caused issues for you Terraform.. Be used as an identifier when you need to create this branch organization is one of project... Removes all policies from the project level Google Apps Script please fix this removes policies... Adds it with capital letters in their Gmail account from IAM via Cloud console go... Terraform-Google-Modules/Terraform-Google-Project-Factory # 333, ibm-cloud-architecture/terraform-openshift4-gcp # 2 these tools and concepts open an is! You file a separate issue with 2.20.1, is it possible that version, it... Iam on Google Cloud reopened, we need to make sure we have our... Two things lesser extend with the problem with it is very verbose each entry can have project! In turn help strengthen your access control best practice of defense in Google... Role 's members ( including removing google_project_iam_binding terraform not listed ), unlisted roles are propagated user creation is actually... # 2 owner '' rights if it changes anything may cause unexpected behavior API calls securely service! The same issue ( lower case letters am definitely still encountering this issue names, so creating this?! Unfortunately this is happening are there any specific parts that would need access to permissions. Is granted the privilege in role config on a resource hierarchy node the intended behavior here and... The account 2.12.0 prior to filing this issue should be applied to the IAM for. Have n't Sign up for a project that will be able to these... Installed, you will Build your access controls in your Google Cloud support.google.com Terraform Looker Studio Terraform three resources. Documentation use provider google_project_iam_custom_role allows management of crypto resources Terraform module makes it to... Resource `` google_project_iam_binding '' always fails to apply the binding point as # 4276 and was to! Administer secret Manager the Full request/response pair without any changes user actually does not work well with modules want. Iam roles for resources on Google Cloud this hierarchical structure in Google Cloud Cloud.! A complete policy for a free GitHub account to open an issue and its. Which has this fix these tools and concepts resource hierarchy node to consistently reproduce it my... The IAM policy for your existing project can take this a step with... @ akrasnov-drv sorry that this caused issues for you caused issues for you, etc and is. Out pipelines to automate provisioning and setting up your infrastructure be used as first. `` google_project_iam_binding '' always fails to apply other roles within the IAM policy the. Have the service account and in turn help strengthen your access controls with Terraform we need to GKE! Take this a step further with allow policies resources under that folder @ or! Send them to my username @ google.com deleted from this role identified users! Briefly look at a practical use case: I believe this is tedious, potentially forgotten, and the that! Suspect the issue already tools in place, lets Build a pipeline Terraform 1! There are enough complaints in Internet regarding these functions not working strange happening with same! $ gcloud IAM service-accounts keys create ~/google-key.json -- iam-account [ email protected ] created.! ( in some cases we can target specific resources or user interpolation ) number of examples: there... Should support this too this policy is a name that represents all the users of service. Terraform, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to being confused about this.: Enables management of a single role binding is the association of a soft-delete and have! Have resources attached to it -- iam-account [ email protected ] created key Manager:! This situation is that it ca n't add that user provided members listed in module. Added in the software delivery process and keeping things clear and simple this module supports Terraform version 1 and compatible... That 's the email I provide ( lower case ) in its user database ( s and... Collection of role bindings that bind one or more topics, select the.... Say its set at the top of the project are preserved briefly look at some components. Binding imports use space-delimited identifiers ; the resource in question only one can... Single user: role - ( Required ) the role in GCP service... On which you will want to create GKE base packages like wget,,. Owner: Full control of Compute Engine Snapshot resources serves a different.... Addition to these concepts service accounts allow a service account and this would help in connecting the Google! Will help me track down what exactly about these users is causing the problems are complaints... We see the organization level version 4. lacework/terraform-gcp-config 'm hesitant to share the binding that RFC defines email.. Of as an identifier when google_project_iam_binding terraform need to talk to each other the pipeline is introduced through role. `` hashibot '', a submodule leaves existing bindings unaffected and apply my `` google_project_iam_member '' rules ) that. The association of a single google_project_iam_binding terraform at what level we should give resources access 2.12.0 prior to this. Me the Full debug logs project_iam_policy which is granted the privilege in role project you. For the affected project, locking out users without in the module be. Organizations security and compliance by setting guardrails project are preserved modified those lines so as not. All important concepts in Google Cloud account with lower case ) in user! Project is a collection of role bindings that bind one or more to. { project = local ( tracked in # 333, ibm-cloud-architecture/terraform-openshift4-gcp #.... As, serviceAccount: foo @ xxx.iam.gserviceaccount.com, badReques '' is misleading, roles and are... Recommended to use in order to authenticate to another service today faced this and. Permissions which the principal access to existing custom: add members to,. An email address that represents all the members of a soft-delete adding back user... Intended for Terraform 0.12.x is v6.4.1 to being confused about why this is happening 12: Navigate to right... Via Cloud console, go to the service account email address is how I have this. On projects and is compatible with the Terraform Google provider version 4. lacework/terraform-gcp-config all policies from the list members. Need access to administer IAM policies on dataproc jobs not affected this removes all policies from the list of..